| Date | Class | | OQ | C | H | E | K | R | Comments | Flag Rating |
| 07/10/2010 | 7330 - Evidence |  | 3.8 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Yes | his classes are hard to follow and hard to prepare. But, his exams are basically all black-letter law type. So, use flashcards and supplements rather than reading for every class and trying to participate in class. |  |
| 01/25/2009 | 7330 - Evidence | | 3.8 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | Yes | Genuinely a nice person and very concerned with student progress. Make use of his office hours and contact him with any questions you have.
[ 1/1 people found this rating helpful. ] | |
| 12/04/2007 | 7330 - Evidence |  | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | No | I agree with the other posts. Tillers is a nice guy, but really does not make sense at all. His final, although take home, is a 24-hr paper that require research on the net and near-blue booking. Good times. One plus is that he does not cold call, making reading for the class unnecessary. | |
| 05/15/2007 | 7316W - Fact Investigation |  | 3.2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | No | He knows a lot, but communicating that knowledge to the students is NOT his thing. Nice guy, easy 2 credits, unbelievable boredom. This class will NOT help you in your legal career. Period. | |
| 11/02/2006 | 7330 - Evidence | | 2.5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | No | Unfortunately this is class is dreadful and torture. He seems to be a nice man but teaching shouldn't be his day job. | |
| 09/18/2006 | 7330 - Evidence | | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | No | Worst professor in the school. I'm warning you, don't take him.
[ 2/2 people found this rating helpful. ] | |
Number of Ratings: 
